Fly Ash and Geogrid Reinforced Clay: A Sustainable Approach for Road and Embankment Construction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65904/3083-3590.2025.01.04Keywords:
Clay soil, Class C Flyash, Geogrid, CBR, Predictive model, Sustainable InfrastructureAbstract
Clayey soils are often regarded as problematic soil in civil engineering due to their low shear strength, high compressibility and poor drainage capacity. These characteristics limit their suitability for use in roadways, embankments and foundation subgrades unless appropriate stabilization techniques are adopted. In recent years, the use of industrial by-products and geosynthetic materials has gained attention as a sustainable and cost-effective solution. This study presents an experimental investigation into the combined effects of Class C fly ash and Geogrid reinforcement on the geotechnical performance of clayey soil.
A systematic testing program was conducted on untreated clay, clay mixed with varying percentages of fly ash (10% – 30%), and clay–fly ash composites reinforced with Geogrid layers (single and double layers). Standard laboratory experiments, including Atterberg limits, compaction characteristics and California Bearing Ratio (CBR) tests, were conducted to evaluate the strength improvement. The results revealed that untreated clay exhibited a CBR of 5.79%, confirming its weakness in its natural state. The inclusion of fly ash significantly enhanced strength, with the CBR progressively increasing to 15.16% at 30% replacement. Further improvement was obtained when Geogrid was incorporated. The optimum performance was achieved with 20% fly ash combined with two Geogrid layers placed at 0.5 and 0.66 depths from the top, resulting in a maximum CBR value of 16.35%, which is nearly three times higher than that of untreated soil.
The findings highlight that the modification made by flyash and geogrid causes favourable improvements in CBR through enhanced strength and load distribution. In addition, the reuse of fly ash addresses disposal concerns while reducing construction costs. This study confirms that fly ash–Geogrid stabilization is a practical, eco-friendly and technically viable method for improving weak subgrades, making it highly suitable for sustainable road and embankment construction. The study also establishes a predictive model correlating CBR with fly ash content and geogrid configuration, enabling intelligent, data-driven approaches to subgrade design.
References
Alterary, S. S., & Marei, N. H. (2021). Fly ash properties, characterization, and applications: A review. Journal of King Saud University-Science, 33(6), 101536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101536
Biswas, A., Asfaque Ansari, M., Dash, S. K., & Murali Krishna, A. (2015). Behavior of geogrid reinforced foundation systems supported on clay subgrades of different strengths. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 1(3), 20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-015-0023-5
Chatrabhuj, & Meshram, K. (2024). Use of geosynthetic materials as soil reinforcement: an alternative eco-friendly construction material. Discover Civil Engineering, 1(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44290-024-00050-6
Deepak, M. S., Rohini, S., Harini, B. S., & Ananthi, G. B. G. (2021). Influence of fly-ash on the engineering characteristics of stabilised clay soil. Materials Today: Proceedings, 37, 2014-2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.497
Jahandari, S., Tao, Z., Saberian, M., Shariati, M., Li, J., Abolhasani, M., Kazemi, M., Rahmani, A., & Rashidi, M. (2022). Geotechnical properties of lime-geogrid improved clayey subgrade under various moisture conditions. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 23(9), 2057-2075. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2021.1950816
Jayakumar, J., Venkatesh, J., & Selvaraju, Y. R. (2020). Expansive Subgrade Strength Improvement using Geogrid and Geotextile Layers. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 955(1), 12064. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/955/1/012064
Jazi, M., Gazder, U., Arifuzzaman, M., Abid, M., & others. (2023). State-of-the-art review on utilization of fly ash in pavement structures. The Journal of Engineering Research, 20(1), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.53540/tjer.vol20iss2pp33-44
Jeevanantham, V., Jayashree, J., & Magudeaswaran, P. (2016). Influence of fly ash in strength characteristics of cohesive soils. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 7(6), 67-72.
Jayashree, J. and Jeevanantham, V., (2022). Experimental Study on Strength Characteristics of Fly Ash and Rice Husk Ash added Clay Soil. Materials Research Proceedings, 23, pp.122-127. https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644901953-16
Karim, H. H., Samueel, Z. W., & Jassem, A. H. (2020). Behaviour of soft clayey soil improved by fly ash and geogrid under cyclic loading. Civil Engineering Journal, 6(2), 225-237. https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2020-03091466
Noaman, M. F., Khan, M. A., Ali, K., & Hassan, A. (2022). A review on the effect of fly ash on the geotechnical properties and stability of soil. Cleaner Materials, 6, 100151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clema.2022.100151
Singh, P., Gill, K. S., & others. (2012). CBR improvement of clayey soil with geo-grid reinforcement. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 2(6), 315-318.
Sinha, P., Anusha Raj, K., Kumar, S., & Singh, D. (2022). Mechanical behavior of geotextile and geogrids on soil stabilization: a review. Recent Advances in Mechanical Engineering: Select Proceedings of CAMSE 2021, 299-308. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2188-9_28
Turan, C., Javadi, A. A., Vinai, R., & Beig Zali, R. (2022). Geotechnical characteristics of fine-grained soils stabilized with fly ash, a review. Sustainability, 14(24), 16710. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416710
Wagale, M., Dandin, S., Bokil, S., & Sathe, S. (2024). Potential use of fly ash in structural fill application: a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(1), 90-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-30968-w
